~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

After my death our beloved Church abroad will break three ways ... first the Greeks will leave us as they were never a part of us ... then those who live for this world and its glory will go to Moscow ... what will remain will be those souls faithful to Christ and His Church. ~St. Philaret of NY

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~





Vespers Doxasticon for the Holy Fathers

DEP PSALTIC ARTS GROUP -Saturday Vespers Doxasticon for the Holy Fathers   

Add star 

John-Peter Presson

Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 2:22 PM



The recording was from a couple of months ago for the Pentecostarion Sunday of the Holy Fathers.  The doxasticon is the same as tonight's, albeit the Mode of the week is Plagal 2nd instead of tonights assigned Plagal 1.


John Peter Presson
John Peter Presson
Protopsaltis of the Diocese of Etna and Portland
Director of Liturgical Music -Holy Nativity of the Theotokos Cathedral -Portland, OR
Musicorum et cantorum magna est distantia, isti dicunt, illi sciunt quae componit musica. - Guido of Arrezzo

Concerning the Deacon Who Contended Against the Bishop

St. Cyprian of Carthage
To Rogatianus, Concerning the Deacon Who Contended Against the Bishop

Argument.— Cyprian Warns the Bishop Rogatianus to Restrain the Pride of the Deacon Who Had Provoked Him with His Insults, and to Compel Him to Repent of His Boldness; Taking Occasion to Repeat Once More Whatever He Has Said in the Previous Letter, About the Sacerdotal or Episcopal Power.

1. Cyprian to his brother Rogatianus, greeting.

I and my colleagues who were present with me were deeply and grievously distressed, dearest brother, on reading your letter in which you complained of your deacon, that, forgetful of your priestly station, and unmindful of his own office and ministry, he had provoked you by his insults and injuries.  And you indeed have acted worthily, and with your accustomed humility towards us, in rather complaining of him to us; although you have power, according to the vigour of the episcopate and the authority of your See, whereby you might be justified on him at once, assured that all we your colleagues would regard it as a matter of satisfaction, whatever you should do by your priestly power in respect of an insolent deacon, as you have in respect of men of this kind divine commands.  Inasmuch as the Lord God says in Deuteronomy, “And the man that will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest or the judge, whoever he shall be in those days, that man shall die; and all the people, when they hear, shall fear, and shall no more do impiously.”  And that we may know that this voice of God came forth with His true and highest majesty to honour and avenge His priests; when three of the ministers — Korah, Dathan, and Abiram — dared to deal proudly, and to exalt their neck against Aaron the priest, and to equal themselves with the priest set over them; they were swallowed up and devoured by the opening of the earth, and so immediately suffered the penalty of their sacrilegious audacity.  Nor they alone, but also two hundred and fifty others, who were their companions in boldness, were consumed by a fire breaking forth from the Lord, that it might be proved that God's priests are avenged by Him who makes priests.  In the book of Kings also, when Samuel the priest was despised by the Jewish people on account of his age, as you are now, the Lord in wrath exclaimed, and said, “They have not rejected you, but they have rejected me.”  And that He might avenge this, He set over them Saul as a king, who afflicted them with grievous injuries, and trod on the people, and pressed down their pride with all insults and penalties, that the despised priest might he avenged by divine vengeance on a proud people.

2. Moreover also Solomon, established in the Holy Spirit, testifies and teaches what is the priestly authority and power, saying, “Fear the Lord with all your soul, and reverence His priests;" and again, “Honour God with all your soul, and honour His priests.” Sirach 7:29,31  Mindful of which precepts, the blessed Apostle Paul, according to what we read in the Acts of the Apostles, when it was said to him, “Do you revile thus God's high priest? ”answered and said, “I knew not, brethren, that he was the high priest; for it is written, You shall not speak evil of the ruler of your people.”  Moreover, our Lord Jesus Christ Himself, our King, and Judge, and God, even to the very day, of His passion observed the honour to priests and high priests, although they observed neither the fear of God nor the acknowledgment of Christ.  For when He had cleansed the leper, He said to him, “Go, show yourself to the priest, and offer the gift.”  With that humility which taught us also to he humble, He still called him a priest whom He knew to be sacrilegious; also under the very sting of His passion, when He had received a blow, and it was said to Him, “Do you answer the high priest so?”  He said nothing reproachfully against the person of the high priest, but rather maintained His own innocence saying, “If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil; but if well, why do you smite me?”  All which things were therefore done by Him humbly and patiently, that we might have an example of humility and patience; for He taught that true priests were lawfully and fully to be honoured, in showing Himself such as He was in respect of false priests.

3. But deacons ought to remember that the Lord chose apostles, that is, bishops and overseers; while apostles appointed for themselves deacons after the ascent of the Lord into heaven, as ministers of their episcopacy and of the Church. But if we may dare anything against God who makes bishops, deacons may also dare against us by whom they are made; and therefore it behooves the deacon of whom you write to repent of his audacity, and to acknowledge the honour of the priest, and to satisfy the bishop set over him with full humility.  For these things are the beginnings of heretics, and the origins and endeavours of evil-minded schismatics; — to please themselves, and with swelling haughtiness to despise him who is set over them.  Thus they depart from the Church — thus a profane altar is set up outside — thus they rebel against the peace of Christ, and the appointment and the unity of God.  But if, further, he shall harass and provoke you with his insults, you must exercise against him the power of your dignity, by either deposing him or excommunicating him.  For if the Apostle Paul, writing to Timothy, said, “Let no man despise your youth,” how much rather must it be said by your colleagues to you, Let no man despise your age?  And since you have written, that one has associated himself with that same deacon of yours, and is a partaker of his pride and boldness, you may either restrain or excommunicate him also, and any others that may appear of a like disposition, and act against God's priest.  Unless, as we exhort and advise, they should rather perceive that they have sinned and make satisfaction, and suffer us to keep our own purpose; for we rather ask and desire to overcome the reproaches and injuries of individuals by clemency and patience, than to punish them by our priestly power.  I bid you, dearest brother, ever heartily farewell.

source

A Call to end this Open Letter business...

.http://internetsobor.org/avtorskaya-kolonka/stati/avtorskaya-kolonka/eshche-odno-otkrytoe-pismo
.

Another "Open Letter"

Author: a. Valery Leonichev incl. . Published in a newspaper column (Views: 80)
 Open letter on the closure of "open letters"

Lord, fathers and sisters! 
I call on you, and it's just a private heart, please, try to try not to practice the works of the notification of his private opinion of boiling perturbed mind, the views on church ROCA problems outlined in the genre of circular letters to all and sundry that in the church ROCA world are the prerogative of the bishops, or a set of special and blessed them censored writers in our church media information, and to cease publication of the so-called "open letters" bishops, Synod and other clergy in all the suitable, in your opinion about it.

Let's have a stroke, and the chain of command to send their bewilderment at first, and after personally to someone you do not understand why no-unpleasant. There is, finally, in the Church hierarchy, rules of etiquette and ethics of the church! Not too known "open letters" Romans, Corinthians, Titov and Timothy the apostle Paul ...)) (such a tradition in the Church as something did not work ...)

The church, all are - a monarchy rather than democracy Agora '!

Sometimes in the personal correspondence all doubts and questions are resolved quickly. And there is no need our personal claims to the metropolitan and bishops do areal and sometimes publicly dismantling before us quite knowledgeable people - it is indecent, methinks.

We know that for every action there exists opposition, and opposition often very painful (!) ...

For its irresistibly hot-vyryvayuschisya and comments on the problems of non-personal properties there is a place provided for the forum and for publications on "IP", and this seems to be enough. There is an opportunity for analytical articles, a bishop's blessing, and on the main IC belt.

Lord, I ask you, close your "Open Letter"! 
What a childish use of electronic civilization so recklessly destroying our tiny church.

Give our bishops' right to edit the word, "we each have a duty to the business and its (!) Places our church office

And what about our epistolary talented creativity? ... and will the publicly-ka-read your post, undoubtedly the most valuable for the history of mankind, the letter after your death! (Or wait ,,, its a bishop) And if the temptation is still pripretsya, because "it is impossible not to come," he then though, not us!

Take care of yourself!

and. Valery, take advantage of this genre, and forced to last ... 
---------------------------------------------- 
P / C (published by EC, with the blessing of the ruling bishop. And what you all want))op

Vladyka Agafangel Prayer for the Church

Митрополит Агафангел: Молитва о умножении любви и прекращении раздоров в Церкви




        Автор: Митрополит Агафангел вкл. . Опубликовано в РПЦЗ (Просмотров: 126)

Митрополит Агафангел: Ответ на письмо протодиакона Германа

По предложению р.Б. Елизаветы молиться о умирении нашей Церкви, предлагаю сию краткую молитву:
Господи, Боже наш! Единый в Троице славимый и поклоняемый! Союзом любви нас связавый и заповедавый нам едино быти! Положи конец раздорам и нестроениям, ихже меж верных чад Твоих враг насади! Ненависть и злобу в любовь преложи и умножи ю сердцах наших. Да возстанем едино на делание Твое и верно послужим Тебе! Молитвами Пречистыя Твоея Матери и всех святых Твоих. Аминь.
_______________


Thursday, July 28, 2016
Prayer for increase of love and end of conflicts in the Church 
Metropolitan Agafangel urges us all to pray for an increase of love

O Lord, our God, Thou Who art glorified and worshiped as One in Trinity! Thou Who hast bound us in the unity of love and commanded us to be one; put an end to the strife and discord that the enemy has sown among Thy faithful children! Transform hatred and anger into love, and multiply this love in our hearts, that we may arise together to do Thy work and faithfully serve Thee, through the prayers of Thy most pure Mother and of all Thy saints. Amen.

PRAYER FOR THE SALVATION OF RUSSIA

O Lord Jesus Christ our God:

Accept from us, Thine unworthy servants, this fervent supplication, and, having forgiven us all our sins, remember all our enemies that hate and wrong us, and render not unto them according to their deeds, but according to Thy great mercy convert them: the unbelieving to true faith and piety, and the believing that they may turn away from evil and do good.
By Thine all-powerful might, mercifully deliver all of us and Thy holy Church from every evil circumstance.
Free our Russian Land from the cruel godless ones and their power and raise the holy Orthodox Russia; hearken unto the painful cry of Thy faithful servants who cry unto Thee day and night in tribulation and sorrow, O our most merciful God, and lead their life out of corruption.
Grant peace and tranquillity, love and steadfastness, and swift reconciliation to Thy people, whom Thou hast redeemed by Thy precious Blood.
But unto them that have departed from Thee and seek Thee not, be Thou manifest, that not one of them perish, but that all of them be saved and come to the knowledge of Thy truth, that all in harmonious oneness of mind and unceasing love may glorify Thy most holy name, O patient-hearted Lord Who art quick to forgive, unto the ages of ages. Amen. 

.

Fr. German 13th is a jurisdictional ecumenist

from Joanna's notepad
 editorial opinion on our current internal strife

In my opinion, Archdeacon German Ivanov-thirteenth is a jurisdictional ecumenist aiding a potential schism from ROCA.  In my opinion, proof that he is a jurisdictional ecumenist is in the open letter he just published in human English on rocana website (a website operated by the discontents), wherein he publicly criticizes his Metropolitan for not uniting with the R-fragments.

In my opinion it is very sad that the discontents have no problem getting their writings translated into good English, but the ROCA materials and Metropolitan Agafangel's responses can only be read through machine translations.

The url to the Rocana website is no longer listed in the sidebar of this blog.

Russian
Machine English
human English material of the discontents
After the extraordinary meeting of the Synod of Bishops in July 
A letter to Vladika Metropolitan Agafangel 
Dear Vladika Metropolit! 
Bless! 
All the old clergymen and parishioners of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, with whom I am acquainted, were absolutely stunned by the decisions of the last Synod... I myself am only now regaining my composure. Yesterday I received a letter from an old faithful clergyman: “I simply don’t know what to think. Worst of all – I think I just don’t want to think anymore. This is awful!” 
During the last few years, most of the “faithful ranks of the old Russian Orthodox Church Abroad” accepted all forms of limitations and difficulties, and fought, and continued to stand for the Church, regardless of the frequent very difficult and uncomfortable times, and regardless of the many obvious mistakes in church politics. They continued to provide their support despite the lack of an effort in striving towards the essential goal of unifying the “ROCOR remnants”. They patiently put up with all of these difficulties due to their love and strong attachment to the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad. They hoped that although their Church is now broken up into remnants, in the future the Church would be unified, and the various remnants could unify together around us, and those who had departed would return to the unified Church. Not everyone of course would unite, but those about whom I have constantly written to You, who for various reasons have separated themselves administratively from us, but who have not torn themselves away from being faithful to the spirit and the legacy of the Old ROCOR. 
During the last month, seeing the approaching storm, I wrote three very long letters to You relying on my life experience as a clergyman for almost 36 years, and on my close contact with many true pillars of the Orthodox Church. I wrote to try to find a true path, out of an extremely difficult tangled situation, and to avoid a disaster, or even a potential final destruction. I gave You the example of Holy St John of Shanghai in his wise words in “A Call to Church Peace” which for some unknown reason were published on Internet Sobor ten days before the Synod meeting. Earlier I gave you the example of Blessed Metropolitan Anthony, who was not embarrassed to get down onto his knees, to allow Metropolitan Evlogy to read the prayer of absolution over him, for the sake of peace, for the sake of the Church!!! That is how conflicts were resolved in the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, conflicts which were no less serious than the current ones. Canons were not quoted endlessly, cold spiritless* canons were not quoted, canons which every objective and honest observer understands may be applied against either side. 
Unfortunately, the Synod did not pay any regard to these words, did not consider these wise examples, but chose to favour those who today set the tone in our Church, such as Father Nikandr, Leonichev, Vladika Afanasy, i.e. the new arrivals into the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad, who arrived “with their baggage”. People who don’t have the Church experience and understanding, and who even slightly mock when they are told about the spirit of the Church Abroad...I pity Vladika Kirill, Vladika Nikon, Vladika George, who have sincerely joined the ROCA. I also of course pity You, dear Vladika Metropolit. I was always open, honest and sincere with You, just as deeply honest as in this letter. It is unfortunate that my sincerity and my desire to help both the Church and You were misunderstood. You took an important step in 2007, which remains in the memory of many people, and You can here without any real difficulties, repeat this step and enter into the history of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad as its saving helper, as the person who managed to unify the broken parts of the Church body in very difficult complicated circumstances. 
I have already written many times that yet another split in the Church may be impossible to bear, and may be the end of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad. Alas, the last Synod has taken that path... Probably yet another attempt will be made to continue the saving witness of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad. If God wills, maybe this will provide the strength for all those who do not accept the MP. I do not know anything about this yet, but if this happens, given my life 
purpose, I will join this new possibility to continue the path of the Russian Diaspora and will be calling everyone to this cause. What the St Nicholas Parish will decide I cannot yet say. 
I very sincerely regret the situation which has arisen, and have not lost the hope that all of us will manage to again in the near future, unify on the basis of new but tried and reliable principles. 
Asking for Your prayers 
Protodeacon Herman Ivanov- Thirteenth 
*”Spiritless Canons”: in order to avoid misinterpretations I think it is necessary to say that for me, the Canons, being the workings of the Holy Spirit, are without a doubt holy. But also without a doubt, they become “spiritless” when they are being used not to ascertain the truth, but as a weapon to destroy one’s opponent. 
Translated into English from article posted on the ROCA Western Europe Diocese Website 

http://www.karlovtchanin.eu/index.php/istoriaeparkii/796-posle-iyulskogo-vneocherednogo- svnoda-protodiakon-german-ivanov-trinadtsatyj 

Stickies

• Cowboy lassoes a thief at Walmart

• Evil person sues everybody left and right (and represents himself in court, which is a red flag that he's a psychopath)

• Wild baby ocelot is friendly and playful.  Too cute!  All "cat" for sure!

River of Fire

Book Review



St. John of Damascus On Antichrist

Orthodox Life magazine 1973 (1) pages 19–22

FROM THE FATHERS OF THE CHURCH 

ON ANTICHRIST
by St. John of Damascus

We do not want anyone to misunderstand the purpose of this series from the Fathers on Antichrist.  There will be several series from the works of the Fathers because every Orthodox Christian must have a, consciousness of the Fathers of the Church.  That the first such series should be on the subject of Antichrist is no effort on our part to predict that the day of Antichrist is now only a measurable distance in the future.  It may very well be, for the times most certainly lead to such a conclusion.  But it is not for us to say.  This series is, first of all, a response to the tampering with our Divine Service books which is proposed or even being carried out in some of the apostate "Orthodox" churches.  Under the guise of "brotherly love" certain of the nominally Orthodox bodies have undertaken to "remove all unfavourable references to the Jews from the Orthodox service books."  If one is not overwhelmed at the pride of people who could propose to improve upon what the Holy Spirit has given through our God-bearing Fathers, then one must notice one thing.  Precisely what these faithless ones wish to remove from our Service Books is all reference to and warning about the Antichrist.  Does one suspect that this action is without significance?  It is for this reason that we have chosen to bring this subject to the fore in this first series from the works of the Holy Fathers and from the Divine Service Books, so that Orthodox Christians will have the possibility to compare exactly what is being taken from them rather than to listen to some well-sounding emotional platitudes about fraternalism with non-Christians.


IT SHOULD BE KNOWN that the Antichrist is bound to come.  Everyone, therefore, who confesses not that the Son of God came in the flesh and is perfect God and became perfect man, after being God, is Antichrist.  (not The Antichrist, but the denial of the perfect Divinity of Christ is an act of being as Antichrist – anti-Christ, as it were.)  But in a peculiar and special sense he who comes at the consummation of the age is called Antichrist.  First then, it is requisite that the Gospel should be preached among all nations, as the Lord said, and then he will come to refute the impious Jews.  For the Lord said to them: "I am come in My Father's name and ye receive Me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive."  And the Apostle says, "Because they received not the love of the truth that they might be saved, for this cause God shall send them a strong delusion that they should believe a lie: that they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness."  The Jews accordingly did not receive the Lord Jesus Christ who was the Son of God and God, but (will) receive the imposter who calls himself God.  For, that he will assume the name of God, the angel teaches Daniel, saying these words: "Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers."   And the Apostle says: "Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day of the Lord shall not come except there come the apostasy first and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God;" in the temple of God he said – not our temple, but the old Jewish temple.  For he will come not to us but to the Jews – not for Christ or the-things of Christ: wherefore he is called Antichrist.  

(And it is clear that Antichrist will reign before the second coming of Christ.  But there is a deadly heresy amongst Protestants that Christ will come first and will reign for a period and then Antichrist will come.  Followers of this heresy, called Chiliasm or The Millineum, will accept Antichrist perforce and follow him and reject Christ.  Let everyone beware, therefore, of all that is taught outside the Holy Church, of all that does not come to us through the Holy Fathers and the Divine Service books, pure and unaltered as. they have come down to us in the eternal Truth of the Holy Church.)

First, therefore, it is necessary that the Gospel should be preached among all nations.  And then shall that wicked one be revealed, even him whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish whom the Lord shall consume with the word of His mouth and shall destroy it with the brightness of His coming.  The devil himself, therefore, does not become a man in the way the Lord was made man.  God forbid! but he becomes man as the offspring of fornication and receives all energy from Satan.  For God, foreknowing the strangeness of the choice that he would make, allows the devil to take up his abode in him.

He is, therefore, as we have said, the offspring of fornication and nurtured in secret and of a sudden he rises up and rebels and assumes rule.  And in the beginning of his rule, or rather tyranny, he assumes the role of sanctity.  But when he becomes master he persecutes the Church of God and displays all his wickedness.  But he will come "with signs and lying wonders," fictitious and not real, and he will deceive and lead away from the living God those whose mind rests on an unsound and unstable foundation, so that even the elect would, if it were possible, be made to trip.

But Enoch and Elias the Tishbite shall be sent and shall turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, (i.e., father to the children, because the fathers are they of the old Israel and the children of the new – the followers of Christ.) that is, the synagogue to our Lord Jesus Christ and the preaching of the Apostles: and they (Enoch and Elias) will be destroyed by him (Antichrist).  And the Lord shall come out of heaven, just as the holy Apostles beheld Him going into heaven, perfect God and perfect Man, with glory and power and will destroy the man of lawlessness, the son of destruction, with the breath of His mouth.  Let no man therefore, look for the Lord to come from the earth, but only out of heaven as He Himself has made certain.  (All attempts to create a "kingdom of heaven" on earth by what ever name are related.)

Opportunity to Invest in the Future of our Church

(GOC America east coast)
"With over 50 children regularly attending our parish, we have the highest ratio of children in our Diocese!"
.

DEP PSALTIC ARTS GROUP -Saturday Vespers

Re: DEP PSALTIC ARTS GROUP -Saturday Vespers with Propers for St. Andrew of Crete & Royal Martyrs of Russia  


Add star 

John-Peter Presson

Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:30 AM


The following is from last Saturday's Vespers for the above.  The both Doxastika melodies for the Hierarch were written by me more or less from standard formulaic construction -an exercise in mental discipline I try to force myself, so if we have a Shola, we can all chant from written music.  The Schola except for the isokratis didn't show, so it was just he and I.  

I spliced out the litanies -you've all heard those a thousand times.



John Peter Presson
Protopsaltis of the Diocese of Etna and Portland
Director of Liturgical Music -Holy Nativity of the Theotokos Cathedral -Portland, OR

Musicorum et cantorum magna est distantia, isti dicunt, illi sciunt quae componit musica. - Guido of Arrezzo

The Calendar Question

Book Review

The Calendar Question
by Priest Basil Sakkas, ROCOR

Defending the tradition of the Church Calendar (a.k.a. "old" calendar) is a different battle for the Greeks and for the Russians.  This is because the national Church in Greece adopted the new calendar.  The Russian Church did not, and neither has the MP.  The Greeks remaining loyal to the Church calendar had to bear severe persecution from their state Church.  The ROCOR did not suffer such serious persecutions over the calendar, but she had to bear watching the Metropolia, her runaway daughter, fall into renovationism and to bear slanderous vilifications from the Metropolia.   

Fr. Basil teaches us, and also at times he speaks directly to all the new calendarists who would scorn and ridicule us to this day.  "Us" includes the Sister Churches, the Old Calendar Churches of Bulgaria, Rumania, Greek, and ROCOR.  The Greeks and Russians fight different battles, but it is the same war – the Mystery of Iniquity trying to destroy the true Church of Christ.  

In 1973 Fr. Basil's book was published by Jordanville.  But before that it was serialized in Orthodox Life magazine.  The first installment starts with the July-August issue of 1972, page 22:



Excerpts from the book:

_____________________________________
However, not having grasped the meaning of the calendar issue, the new calendarists imagine that one day the issue shall be forgotten and that the organism of the Church will dissolve this tumor little by little. Beloved brethren, can time alter the Tradition? Can falsehood be transformed into truth with the passage of time? God forbid! As soon as we have permitted a tiny worm to enter the fruit, no matter how small or imperceptible it is, it will not discontinue being a worm nor will it cease to grow until the fruit has become rotten. In such a case, not only does time not correct these things, but very much to the contrary, it makes them worse; look around you so that you may perceive the truth of these words.

Universal Zionism, the forerunner of the Antichrist, exercises a very subtle and penetrating propaganda in our days, using Masonry also as its right arm. In this manner, it has succeeded in removing from the liturgical books of the Latins all the texts which relate to the deicide committed by ancient Israel, on the excuse that they were anti-Semitic. By removing these passages, the Latins confess that for 2000 years, they have been suffering from an unhealthy anti-Semitism. Insomuch as they are heretics and schismatics, they have understood nothing concerning the theological issue of the Israelite deicide. Ever since 1924 you new calendarists have admitted the corruptive principle of aggiornamento; now how shall you react when the professors of your universities (e.g. the case of Prof. Alivizatos) support the principle of the “revision” of our liturgical texts? Truly, whether we chant such and such a troparion or kontakion is not a dogmatical question (notice, however, the suppression of the name of St. Photius the Great in the newly-published Menaia).



_____________________________________
The difference which existed between St. Basil the Great and Macedonius as regards the issue of the Holy Spirit is the same as exists between the Russian Church in Exile and the Greek Church as regards the calendar issue. It is true, that, for missionary reasons, the Russian Church has not only practiced and continues to practice economy concerning the Western calendar, but also concerning the Western Paschalia and the Western Rite. We regret this, but let those who wish to be scandalized, be scandalized, and let those who wish to understand, understand.

If, for example, the Russian Church in Exile were to permit one of Her own Russian communities to exchange the Orthodox calendar for the Western calendar, this would certainly place Her on the same level as Archbishop Chrysostom Papadopoulos. But when She is confronted with communities who are, spiritually speaking, barbarians, Her duty is to draw them towards Christ and the Truth, even if she must condescend as regards the Western calendar and Paschalia “for a certain time.”

Let him who is of good faith note the following well:

1 Several years ago, the Dutch Orthodox Mission sought to be placed under the canonical jurisdiction of the Archbishop of Western Europe and later Archbishop of San Francisco, John of blessed memory. The mission was granted the use of the new calendar and the Western Paschalia as well as the Western rite.

2 The French Mission which already used the Gregorian calendar and the Western Rite asked that it also be permitted the use of the Western Paschalia like the Dutch. Yet the same Archbishop who granted the Western Paschalia to the Dutch refused it to the French.

3 Several years afterwards, the present Archbishop of Western Europe, the Most Reverent Anthony, deprived the Dutch of the Western Paschalia, which had formerly been permitted them.

4 The French communities under the canonical jurisdiction of the Synod (under the leadership of the most Reverend Abbot Ambrose) that is, those of Lyons and of Paris, abandoned the Gregorian calendar and adopted the Orthodox calendar.

5 Recently two Russian communities, one in Florida and the other in Pennsylvania, sought to join the Synod of Metropolitan Philaret. These communities were formerly under the so-called “Metropolia” which had permitted them to change to the Gregorian calendar. However, our Synod requested that they reject the Gregorian calendar and return to the Orthodox calendar. The communities did not accept this proposal and therefore, their request to join the Synod was also rejected.


Hence, it is evident that the Synod knows when to be lenient and when to be strict in the application of economy. Any intelligent man will understand that he finds before him a true “governing of the household” (from the Greek ecos—“ house,” nomia—“governing”), where condescension and strictness, allowance and refusal, and permission “under certain conditions” are found simultaneously. The spiritual benefit of the faithful is the purpose of every act and everywhere ascendance in spiritual matters can be seen. But in the case of the hierarchy of Greece, descendence is to be seen. It does not matter so much at what level one is found, so much as what direction he is taking.

If one were to ask the Russian Synod in the Diaspora why She permits the partial usage of the Gregorian calendar within Her jurisdiction, She would reply: “In order to save souls, I must sometimes walk according to the ‘pace of little children’ like the Patriarch Jacob” (Gen. 33:14). But if one asked the same question of Chrysostom Papadopoulos and Meletius Metaxakis, what would they answer? Was the Orthodox calendar, perhaps, a hindrance to the salvation of the faithful and, therefore, it was necessary to change it? Behold, therefore, how it is possible to take true facts and present them from a wrong and distorted angle in order to give them another interpretation, according to the method of Fr. Athanasius Gievtits.



Today the book is out of print.  Amazon has 1 copy for $60.

Scribd offers a download, with a paid membership.

SJKP offers a coil-bound hard copy for $15 + shipping

GOC has the book posted on their official website

R-fragment ROAC posts the book in downloadable pdf form
   (This appears to be the same as the Scribd copy.  Looks like Scribd took their copy from ROAC.)
   This same pdf can also be downloaded from an online file storage account:

A Couple Things to Consider for the Election of USA President

The Church does not tell us what party to vote for.
The Church does tell us how to vote:
"Vote with a Christian Conscience"
 ~ guidance from ROCOR priest in 2004


America is doomed by its unrepentant sins:
 • legalizing adultery
 • legalizing abortion
 • legalizing sodomy

Forbidding citizens to possess firearms goes along with Antichrist agenda.
 ~ from the prophesies of St. Kosmas Aetolos (1779†):
43. "They will ask rifles from you. Have double, give one and keep the other. A rifle will save 100 lives."  In the 99th of the book by Triantafyllou: "Foreign troops will come, Christ will believe, language will not know. They will seek weapons. You must have double.   You give the one and keep the other. With others you will sleep and with others will dawn." 
or
https://app.box.com/s/bvk9rad6xfvsd8wpnisar80zu25nkcrb

Part 3: True Athonite Elders Arsenius and Jerome

Orthodox Life magazine 1980 (6)
The Athonite Elders Arsenius and Jerome

At nine o'clock in the morning of 14 November 1885, in the Russian Monastery of the Holy and Greatmartyr Panteleimon on the Holy Mountain, the Elder Hieroschemamonk Jerome reposed.  All Athos revered him: Russians and Greeks, Serbs and Bulgarians, Moldavians and Georgians regarded him as a unique and experienced preceptor, one full of love, merciful and abounding in the gifts of the Holy Spirit, being deftly capable of healing every spiritual wound.  

Metropolitan Antony Khrapovitsky of blessed memory writes: "A touch of regenerating grace does not destroy freedom but draws man to make a decisive choice between good and evil, between self-justification and self-condemnation."  And, by way of example, he later adds: "Some thirty years ago there lived on Mount Athos a magnanimous monk named Jerome, who drew to the Monastery of St. Panteleimon more than a thousand other monks.  His gentleness and charitable attitude towards human frailty were without limit, and many who were tempted by sin felt the spirit of Jerome barring their way; some repented and confessed to him; but there were also some whom the moral interference of the absent elder infuriated into reproach and even assault.  




Hieroschemamonk Jerome was born on 28 June 1803, in the town of Old Oskola in the Kursk district.  His parents were Orthodox and pious, being merchantmen by trade.  His father, Pavel Grigorievich Solomentsev, and his mother Martha Athanasievna (afterwards schemanun Evvula) had great wealth.  Besides Fr. Jerome, whom they named John at Holy Baptism, they had three other sons and a daughter.  The eldest son was a monk, and the whole Solomentsev family was distinguished by their shared disposition towards spiritual asceticism; from among them nearly fifteen people, both men and women, undertook the struggles of the monastic discipline.  From his earliest years John Solomentsev loved the Lord and yearned to serve Him in fasting and prayerful struggles.  He was a natural monk.  Merchantmen's concerns oppressed him, but because his older brother was in a monastery and his younger brothers were still growing up, whether he willed it or no, it fell to his lot to bear this burden as his yoke in order to assist his father with his business.  So he lived in this manner until he was twenty-five, nursing within himself God's calling to the monastic life, the desire for which was more and more kindled in his heart.  Privy to his desire was his sister, Eudocia Pavlovna, a maiden of rare beauty, meek and even-tempered, one who, like her brother, was full of yearning to betroth herself to the Incorruptible Bridegroom.  Neither he, nor she, decided to tell their parents about their desire to go to a monastery.  It was the lot of both of them to wait and forbear until such time as God showed to be favorable.  And so one day they saw that their parents happened to be in a good spiritual disposition, and therefore, having talked amongst themselves, they resolved to approach them together with their requests to retire to a monastery.  Firstly John Pavlovich approached his parents; kneeling before them, he begged them in tears not to insist that he languish in the world, but to bless him to go to a monastery.  His parents were vexed by their son's request for they had hoped to see him as their staff and support in business.  His father fell silent, his mother was silent too; both wept.  In her turn, Eudocia Pavlovna came to her father and mother; she knelt in front of them and began to beseech them not to force her into marriage but also to bless her to retire to a convent.  The parents could not bear this double assault of their children upon them, and they grew extremely angry with them.  Their wrath fell primarily upon their son, John Pavlovich.  The latter promised to stay with his parents for two more years on the condition that they did not insist that his sister marry, and thereupon they quickly gave her leave to enter a convent.  Eudocia Pavlovna was placed by her parents in the convent at Orel where her aunt was already living as a nun.  She later moved to the Borisovskaya Tilchvinskaya Women's Hermitage in the province of Kursk and the county of Grayvoronsk.  Here, as Abbess Margaret, she was the superior.  Abbess Margaret reposed on 14 September 1886.

When he and his sister had parted, John Pavlovich began to feel spiritually alone, but nonetheless he dwelt peacefully in the world amid all its temptations, making progress in his spiritual struggles.  Thus he lived with his parents until he was twenty-seven years of age.  Finally the Lord disposed the hearts of his parents not to detain him any longer in the world but to give him their blessing to take up the monastic life.

At this time, the Lord sent John Pavlovich a spiritual brother named Nicholas, who had himself bumed with the desire to become a monk and with whom he could talk openly and whom he could consult concerning how and where they might find a favorable haven or their salvation.  At the beginning of 1831, both these zealots for spiritual asceticism, armed with pilgrims’ birch bark shoulder bags, left their native city and took to the road.  They set off on a pilgrimage to the monasteries of Russia so that they might observe therein their rule and order of monastic life.  At first they stayed for a time in the Divnogorsky Monastery in the Province Voronezh, and then at the Khotmizhsky Monastery in the Province of Kursk.  However, the life in neither of these monasteries satised their longing, and so the two friends set off for Athos. 

When they arrived in Constantinople, by chance the plague broke out and they were not permitted to dock and had to return to Russia.  They went from Odessa to Voronezh in order to venerate the holy relics of the hierarch and Wonderworker Mitrophan and in this manner to alleviate their sorrow somewhat.  Here, at that time, there lived a fool-for-the-sake-of-Christ who was renowned for his of clairvoyance. page 12  Therefore the two pilgrims desired to hear from him whether it was God's will that they go to the Holy Mountain Athos or whether they should stay there.  When they came to the fool and asked him about this, fixedly staring at them, he said: "Go, my brethren, from Old Oskola, go to the Holy Mountain Athos, go!  You, my brother Nicholas, will go there, live a while, receive the holy schema and will set yourself upon the way of no return.  And you, my brother John, will go to Athos, and will set up your hive of bees and will loose your swarms.  Go, God bless you!"  However it happened that the brothers from Old Oskola must needs wait a little in Russia before the way to Athos was opened before them.  They entered the Toshevsky Monastery in the Voronezh Province, and dwelt there almost two years.  John fulfilled his obedience there in the choir and in the refectory and because of his gentle disposition he won the love of all the brothers.

In October 1836, they at last arrived on the Holy Mountain and before all else they were mindful to find themselves an experienced elder and spiritual father in whom they could wholly trust to their own spiritual profit.  At that time, the Elder Arsenius was renowned on Athos for the sanctity of his life, his spiritual discernment and his profound experience in the way of asceticism.  He had been born in Great Russia, a native of the Province of Nizhegorodsk from the city of Balachna.  In his youth he had left the home of his parents, who were common merchant-folk, and had gone as a wandering pilgrim to the holy places, finally joining the brethren of the Nikolaevsky Peshoshsky Community Hermitage in the Province of Moscow where he dwelt three years.  Having heard about the strict ascetic life of the monks in the Moldavian monasteries, he made his way there.  He toured all the monasteries and, in the end, settled in the Balashevsky Skete near the city of Butashana where he found for himself an experienced spiritual father and elder to whom he fully committed himself in perfect obedience.  The elder tonsured him as a monk with the name Abel and later constrained him to receive priestly ordination.  At first this decision of the elders was very burdensome to him and he began to beg him not to impose this yoke upon him and not to raise him to the order of the priesthood for it exceeded his powers.  However the elder explained to him that such was God's will for him and that it did not befit one who was truly obedient to hold an opinion of his own but that he should rather do what the elder wished for him without objecting.  Abel bowed to the elder and said: "Forgive me, holy father, I have sinned before you; do with me as you please!"  And thus he was made a priestmonk, but, regardless of this, he continued to live in complete obedience to his elder until his very end.  He had a fellow-struggler who was of one mind with him, the monk Nicander, who was also of Russian descent; they had come to the Balashevsky Skete together and they lived with the elder.  After the latter's repose, Fr. Nicander asked Fr. Abel to be his elder and spiritual father, but he did not agree to this, and they proposed between themselves to live in complete obedience to one another as brothers, and thus they passed their lives in a manner pleasing to God.  Wherefore both received revelations from on high that they should leave Moldavia and settle on the Holy Mountain.  The fathers of the Balashevsky Skete, although they were grieved at parting with these good strugglers, neither dissuaded them nor did they put them in fear of the difficulty of the journey and the savagery of the Turks.

It was not without difficulties, sorrows and privations that they reached Mount Athos, where they settled on the holdings of the lveron Monastery in the desert of the Skete of St. john the Forerunner.  Both received the holy schema; Abel with the name of Arsenius, and Nicander with the name Nicholas.  By cultivating the vegetable garden and by making wooden spoons, they earned their daily bread, living as strangers to every excess and to all worldly acquisitions.  Fr. Arsenius was well read in the writings of the Holy Fathers and, having followed their strict school of obediences, he was filled with spiritual discernment and many other gifts of the Holy Spirit.  Many came to him, desiring to have him as their elder and spiritual father and thus the tranquility which both the elders had enjoyed in the Skete of the Forerunner began to be destroyed, therefore they chose as their abode the ruined cell of St. John Chrysostom which was deep in the wilderness in the neighborhood of the Skete.  They restored the cell and settled therein for the sake of quietness.  Here, twenty years after coming to the Holy Mountain, schemamonk Nicholas reposed in sanctity, but hieroschemamonk Arsenius made so much progress in spiritual struggling that he became like unto the ancient Fathers: Anthony, Macarius, Euthymius and the others.

During the whole of his life on Mt. Athos, Fr. Arsenius ate neither fish nor cheese, neither oil nor wine.  Each day he partook of his scanty fare in the afternoon before evening fell; however on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays he ate nothing, yet he was of a healthy and fresh countenance.  One of his spiritual children, the monk Parthenius, remembers him thus: "The elder (literally, spiritual father), Hieroschemamonk Arsenius, was moderately tall with blond hair, a beard of middling size but bushy and threaded with grey hairs.  He always held his head tilted a little towards his right shoulder.  His face was clean and always dry and always ruddy: and especially during the divine services one could scarcely look upon it.  He was ever joyous, of pleasant countenance, his eyes brimming with tears, his words meek and quiet.  He always spoke without fawning, always decidedly without repetition."  He possessed the gift of tears to a high degree, and usually when he celebrated the holy liturgy in the hermitage chapel he could not refrain from weeping; he shed tears unrestrainedly.  Fr. Parthenius describes one such liturgy: "After matins I confessed and disclosed to my spiritual physician and pastor (Fr. Arsenius) all my wounds and sicknesses, even those of my youth, all my actions and undertakings, my every desire and thought.  He then applied a dressing to all my sores and maladies, treated them, and set me completely at rest.  The elder celebrated the liturgy in linen vestments; I was altar-boy, and Father Nicholas sang in a quiet, tearful voice, and because of his tears his voice was scarcely audible.  The elder stood in the altar before the Lord's Throne completely given over to weeping and he could hardly make the exclamations.  And I, the ungodly and sinful one, being in the midst of such great fiery pillars was filled with fear and with dread, and did not know where to direct my hearing.  Everywhere it roused me to weep, and while looking at them, I could not restrain my tears."  Fr. Arsenius loved to celebrate the liturgy often.  He lived in the utmost non-acquisitiveness and successfully guided those living around him to spiritual proficiency.

When, in 1836, there came to Athos from Russia the priestmonk Anicetas, Prince Shirinsky-Shichmatov in the world, himself a great ascetic, he chose Fr. Arsenius as his spiritual father and until the very end he remained in the closest spiritual relationship with him.

Many afflictions made trial of Fr. Arsenius during the course of his life on Mt. Athos; their cause was human folly, but, being completely submissive to the will of God, he suffered and endured everything.  He happened to move from the desert skete of St. John Chrysostom to the Lacus Skete of the Holy Greatmartyr Demetrius, where it later proved impossible to stay and so, finally, be procured for himself the solitary cell of the Holy Trinity near the Monastery of Stavronikita.  Here he dwelt until his repose, being honored in holiness and glorified by all the monks of Mount Athos, especially by the Russians who regarded him as their supreme spiritual leader and pastor.  The Elder Arsenius exercised great authority on the Holy Mountain; no one could gainsay him for there were instances when those who contradicted him were punished by God, therefore in all the monasteries and sketes of the Holy Mountain his word was respected as that of a man of God.  He himself was a practitioner of the mental prayer of Jesus and reached a high degree of proficiency in it, and thus he faithfully guided his disciples along this path, one not easy but of salutary monastic labor.  He was distinguished by his of clairvoyance and was not lacking in the gift of wonderworking.

And so it chanced that God directed the brothers John and Nicholas from Old Oskcola to this elder, and they found him to be a true father and director to salvation.  Perceiving in the Holy Spirit that they were capable of beiug spiritual strugglers, he received them with love and tonsured them as monks, naming John – Ioannikios and Nicholas – Nicetas.  He settled them in the vicinity of his own cell, blessing Fr. loannikios to procure the desert cell of St. Elias the Prophet for himself, and Fr. Nicetas the cell of the Holy Archangels where, when he ahd dwelt there but two years and had been deemed worthy of the holy schema, taking the name Nikodemos, he peacefully reposed according to the prophecy oft he clairvoyant fool-for-Christ in Voronezh.

Fr. Ioannikios enjoyed the particular confidence and love of the Elder Arsenius.  Quietly and calmly his life flowed by in the hermitage cell of the Holy Prophet Elias.  With his elder's blessing he accepted several disciples to live in his cell as in a community; these he directed according to the elder's precepts in a spirit of meekness and humility.  They worked with him in the garden and on the vegetable patch, and prayed with him in the house-chapel, whither the Elder Arsenius himself came on occasion.  He used to celebrate the Divine Liturgy and administer the Holy Mysteries to them.  Such days were great feasts for the humble fellow-strugglers.  Fr. Ioannikios himself did not venture to consider the office of the priesthood; when he was yet in Russia he had acknowledged that he was not worthy of holy orders and on Athos he was of the same opinion concerning his own unworthiness.  This feeling the Elder Arsenius fostered in him for the sake of his perfection in humility.  Feeling that many people would be burdensome, Fr. loannikios never had more than three disciples with him.  These disciples never saw him idle nor angered; he never offended any of them by so much as a word, nor even by a glance.  He distinguished himself by his meekness and long-suffering.  He instructed them and led them on the path of asceticism more by his example than by his words, for which reason they sincerely loved him and accounted every day that passed in his absence as an adverse one for themselves.  Bearing witness to these things, Fr. Parthenius, who lived in obedience with Fr. Ioannikios, writes: "One found in him a great and learned man, accomplished in interior and spiritual wisdom, well-read and versed in the Divine Scriptures and the writings of the Fathers.  Although I have read many books, compared with his reading it is like a drop in the ocean; and, in that I would no sooner ask him something but that he would give me the answer, every hour I profited from him.  He was always meek and lenient; he bore all our infirmities, and throughout my whole life I have never seen a man so meek and patient.  He was accomplished in every good work; he did not teach us by his words but by his very deeds he instructed us, and was in everything an example to us.  When speaking he was mellifluous, sound and judicious, and had such power of speech that, although one might be stony of heart, he could prevail over such a one and bring him to tears.  He was able to admonish everyone and set them upon the true path.  All that was lacking was that he was not a priestmonk and he did not at all want to be ordained.  For this reason, to flee ordination, he had left Russia.  He was fairly tall in stature, with long, light blonde hair, and a long, broad and blond beard; his face was fair and pale and always joyous, his countenance most agreeable but ever wan and lean because of his great struggles and his poor health.  Oftentimes he engaged us in spiritual conversation, and we often passed the whole night until morning without sleep.  So happily did we spend the night when he gave such talks that we would forget its very existence and would forget sleep, too.  And so greatly was my heart attached to him, so much did my soul love him, that I accounted it a great loss if for an hour I could not see him or hear a profitable word from him.  When we saw his face we forgot ourselves!  I purposed never to be separated from him even unto death.  And when he fell ill, we wept that day, and begged God to restore his health.  Living with such an elder, I rejoiced and gave thanks to the Lord God that He had vouchsafed me to be the disciple of two such great elders." 

On his arrival on Mount Athos in 1836, priestmonk Anicetas made an attempt to settle those Russians with him in the partly desolate Rossikon and to build a church there in the name of the holy Hierarch and Wonderworker Mitrophan of Voronezh.  However this attempt was not crowned with any lasting success and in a short while Fr. Anicetas was obliged to abandon the Rossikon and to settle with all his Russian brethren in the Little Russian Skete of the Holy Prophet Elias.  But unfortunately even here the Russians were unable to find a permanent refuge.  The Little Russians became indignant because of them and forced them to leave their skete. and they, the Russians, lived like homeless orphans, scattered about the various sketes and cells of Mount Athos, having as their only axis and principal the elder and spiritual father, Hieroschemamonk Arsenius. 

Meanwhile, the condition of the ancient Rossikon (St. Panteleimon's Monastery, which had been granted to the Russians by the Byzantine emperors in the days of the Kievan Princes and which had, for various reasons, subsequently been abandoned by them), after the departure of Fr. Anicetas, became lamentable indeed.  The community was burdened with debts which jeopardized its trading contracts. In everything it was subject to exiguity, and fell into ruin and desolation.  There lay over it, as it were, the seal of God's chastisement which even the best of the Greek brethren living there could not recognize. 

The centenarian elder, Hierodeacon Schemamonk Benedict, and his disciple, the igumen of the Rossikon, Gerasimos, were the first to notice and acknowledge that the only means of reestablishing the decaying and ancient community would be the return of the Russians.  And so, in 1839, on their initiative, an invitation was composed in the name of all the brethren of the Rossikon asking that the Russian monks expelled from the Prophet Elias Skete by the Little Russians return to the Monastery of the Holy and Greatmartyr Panteleimon, which in ancient times had belonged to them.  Here they were to settle and live together in community under the rule of the Abbot Gerasimos.  This invitation had been predicted by Father Arsenius, and he entreated Hieroschemamonk Paul not to oppose the will of God, but, having gathered his Russian brethren, to go in peace with them to the Rossikon.  He assured him that this time their stay there would be lasting and of great profit to the Russians on Mount Athos. Hieroschemamonlc Paul reluctantly consented to go and live at the Rossikon.  He wished to delay a little in moving his brotherhood, but the Elder Arsenius forbade this.  Thus, at the insistence of the elder, Fr. Arsenius, Fr. Paul moved with the whole of his Russian community into the Russian Monastery of St. Panteleimon on 20 November 1839, and in so doing he laid the foundation for its restoration, both interior and exterior.  The Elder Benedict, who was a hundred and six years of age, had always told them that he would not die until the Russians returned to the monastery.  When they were receiving the Russians in the guesthouse, he clearly bore witness to this.  He came into the guesthouse with his staff, and having made three prostrations to the ground, with tears he recited the prayer "Now lettest Thou Thy servant depart in peace, O Master" unto the end.  Then he went up to Fr. Paul, prostrated before him and took his blessing.  Afterwards, having embraced him, he began as follows: "Now my heart is gladdened, and my spirit rejoices, for today I hold the Russians in my embrace, I hold the treasure that was lost; now once again the banished sheep has returned, she who formerly wandered over the mountains and in the forests, who had neither fold nor shelter for her own, nor where to lay her head.  Now once again she has returned to her former fold, now I hold her in my embraces, I shall not banish her again, nor will I turn her away.  Now I have cleansed my conscience, which had always accused and troubled me on account of the Russians that we had banished." 

The Russian brotherhood was established within the Rossikon, on special Conditions; being under the overall rule of the Greek Abbot, Father Gerasimos, who governed the monastery, they were, nevertheless, separately under the spiritual care of their own confessor, Hieroschemamonk Paul.  They were granted a church of their own so that they might celebrate the divine services in the Slavonic language, and generally they enjoyed a measure of independence within the community.  Initially, it was diflicult for both Russians and Greeks to dwell together in one monastery, however, God helping Abbot Gerasimos and Fr. Paul, it proved possible to avoid conflicts and dissatisfaction, and the life of the Russians and that of the Greeks passed peaceably under the grace-bestowed protection of the Holy Greatmartyr and Healer Panteleimon.  As it chanced, the Lord did not give Fr. Paul long to live and labor in the Rossikon.  It fell to his lot only to clear the path to that powerful spiritual laborer, Fr. loannikios, and by his very bones, to lay the lasting foundation of the Russian sojourn in the Rossikon.  On 2 August 1840, he fell asleep in the Lord; he had not yet lived there a year.  The Russians and the Greeks mourned him bitterly, in him they had both lost much.

The orphaned Russian brethren decided that they could have no greater spiritual father and guide than the Elder Arsenius himself or his true disciple Fr. Ioannikios.  They told their superior, Abbot Gerasimos, of this and with his blessing went to beg the Elder Arsenius to come and live with them in the monastery.  However, on the way they came upon Fr. loannikios in his cell and they began to invite him to be their spiritual father, for they foresaw that the Elder Arsenius, being well advanced in years, would not agree to leave his solitude and go to dwell in the community.  Fr. Ioannikios resolutely refused the position of spiritual father in the Rossikon.  Thereupon the Russian monks made their way to the elder-confessor Arsenius and in tears besought him to come and live with them in the monastery.  He met them with joy and explained that "it is the will of God that Father Ioannikios be the spiritual father of the Russians in the Rossikon."  Therefore, through them he directed Abbot Gerasimos to work to this end.  Having sent the Russian monks home, the Elder Arsenius sent Fr. Ioannikios a note inviting him and his disciples to visit him.  When they arrived, the elder took them into his cell chapel, put on his epitrachelion, took the Cross in his hand and solemnly informed Fr. Ioannikios that the Lord had chosen him as the Rossikon's spiritual father.  In his humility, Fr. Ioannikios protested that he had left the world to flee from the passions and to seek union with God and for this cause he had come to Mt. Athos desiring to live in the desert.  He objected that he had left Russia to avoid ordination, and that he could scarcely guide his disciples yet alone a large community.  Thereupon the elder said: "Everything is good in its own time; it is good to flee ordination, and for the glory of God it is good to accept it, if the Lord so chooses.  As evil as it is to seek ordination, so also it is evil to oppose the will of God.  And what of your poor health, the Lord knows better than you about this; our whole life is in His hands: He has chosen you and will grant you good health.  And what is this that you are saying: that you want to escape the passions in the desert, and to attain to union with God?  Yes, it is so, this can be attained in the desert, such being the will of God that one live there; but in a community one can attain to it the sooner because in the wilderness one only lulls the passions whereas in a community one mortifies them completely, and buries them in humility and obedience and in the cutting off of one's own will.  And when the passions are mortified within us then we come to spiritual peace and we are united with God.  Nowhere is it possible to find the monastic life in our day, except in a community.  Further, you only want to save two people, go and save twenty, and in time fifty.  You must be solicitous for all; it falls to your lot to set the Russian monastery in order, and through you it will be glorified.  Now, go to Karyes and discuss what you will need to with the Greeks, then move to the monastery: the Lord blesses you."  Without raising any further objection, Father Ioannikios fulfilled the wish of the Elder Arsenius.  He disposed of his cell, came to an agreement with Abbot Gerasimos, who joyfully consented to all of his stipulations, he collected his belongings together, and with his disciple moved to the Rossikon.

It was on 20 October 1840 that Fr. Ioannikios settled in the Russian Monastery of St. Panteleimon, where henceforward he was, after the superior Abbot Gerasimos, the foremost laborer in the task of reviving and restoring that ancient and sacred community.  In that same year, with the blessing of his elder and father confessor Arsenius, Fr. Ioannikios was ordained by Gregory the Metropolitan of Adrianopolis who had come to the Holy Mountain on a pilgrimage.  On 21 November, the feast of the Entry of the Most Holy Theotokos into the Temple, he was ordained hierodeacon, and on 23 November hieromonk.  Thereupon he was designated as the community spiritual father of the Russian Monastery of St. Panteleimon.  His knowledge of Greek made this obedience somewhat easier for him, and Fr. Gerasimos found Fr. Ioannikios to be an assiduous and capable assistant in his government of the brethren who came from many diverse national backgrounds.  At the time of Fr. Ioannikios's election to this exceedingly difficult obedience, the Lord consoled him by means of a certain wondrous occurrence, which clearly showed him that God's chosen ones do not labor in vain on the Holy Mountain, but that there they are deemed worthy of His particular mercy.

The aforementioned schemamonk Nikodemos, with whom Fr. Ioannikios had come from Russia to Mount Athos, his fellow countryman and beloved in the Lord, fell asleep when he had dwelt but two years on the Holy Mountain in the cell of the Holy Archangels.  He was buried and thus it happened that on 7 November 1840 the time came for the opening of his grave.  Fr. Ioannikios was invited for the ceremony.  After small Vespers they opened Fr. Nikodemos's tomb, took his bones and bathed them; they were seen to be yellow and fragrant.  They laid them in a basket and, according to the custom, took them into the church for the all-night vigil.  Together with Fr. Ioannikios, the Elder Arsenius was gladdened with spiritual joy seeing that his child, who had reposed in the Lord, had been deemed worthy of God's mercy. 

During the all-night vigil, the fragrance from the bones of the departed became so powerful that it stifled that of the church incense, and even in the altar it was noticed by the celebrants, indeed so much so that Fr. Ioannikios, taking a lighted candle, went up to the departed man's bones which were lying in the basket in the center of the church, and there he noticed that from the ears there flowed streams of fragrant myrrh, whose fragrance was filling the whole church.  Thereupon he loudly cried out: "Come, fathers and brethren; behold this marvellous wonder and praise the Lord Who worketh wonders!"  Everyone in the church gathered round to look, and seeing, they were made glad and gave thanks to God.  Then Fr. Ioannikios said to the brethren: "Behold, my holy fathers, from dry bones there flows forth myrrh, and it streams not from any other place but from the ears alone, and this is because those ears were never satiated in hearing the Word of God and all the soul-saving scriptures.  Fr. Nikodemos, who has reposed in God, was an accomplished reader and chanter, and he so loved to listen to the Holy Scriptures that he was prepared to listen to them day and night without ever growing weary.  I know this well; both of us were natives of the same city, and from our youth we were brothers and loved each other in the Lord.  We left the vain world and its delusions together; for several years we wandered, and together we came to the Holy Mountain Athos desiring to dwell here in one cell; however, because of my disciples, we were separated.  It often used to happen that throughout the whole night I would read to him and he would diligently listen to the Word of God and say: 'So greatly do I love to listen to the Sacred Scriptures that were someone to read them unceasingly I would never grow tired of listening.'  Now the Lord has clearly shown us how profitable it is for us to listen to the Divine Scriptures.  These dry bones, which have been lying in the ground for three years, are gushing forth fragrant myrrh, and this is because Fr. Nikodemos was not only a hearer but a doer of that which he heard in the Scriptures. And now behold he has been vouchsafed a clear sign of the mercy of God that rests upon him."  This miracle greatly consoled Fr. Ioannikios and encouraged him as he undertook the onerous obedience of being spiritual father of the monastery; it also demonstrated to him that his labors would be bountifully rewarded in eternal blessedness. 

On the first Sunday of the Great Lent in 1841, Fr. loannikios, as he had long desired, received the holy schema and was named Jerome.  Having been granted the angelic habit, he undertook a life equal to that of the angels.  He constantly stood before God in prayerful fear, and he labored night and day for the spiritual well-being of the brethren.  God aiding them, the acceptance of the Russians into the community had the very best consequences for it.  Orthodox Russia directed her attention to the monastery once again, and many Russians gave alms for its maintenance and adornment.  Fr. Jerome was able to attract the attention of benefactors from all corners of Russia and particularly from among the rich people of the merchant class into whose ranks he had been born.  Knowing their customs and dispositions, he used this knowledge to the profit of the community.  Several Russian merchants, themselves responsible people, having visited Mount Athos on pilgrimage, were impressed by the excellent interior organization of the Panteleimon Monastery, and more especially by the spiritually salutary discourses and the Godly-wise words of Fr. Jerome.  Many made offerings to the community and even stayed there themselves to finish the course of their earthly lives in monastic endeavors. 




Over and above this, Fr. Jerome undertook to correspond with many people in Russia, and this correspondence itself brought the monastery material aid.  He humbly deferred to the superior, Fr. Gerasimos and did everything in his name; even the very letters were written in his name and Fr. Jerome signed them only after Fr. Gerasimos in the second place.  However, Fr. Jerome was the soul of the correspondence with which he was able to,profit many in Russia spiritually, and thus he gained respect and love for his community.  A number of educated brethren within the community helped him in this work of spiritual edification, and, although he was the master of a great stock of spiritual knowledge, God sent to his aid the well-known writer, Hieromonk Seraphim.  This Svyatogorets, as he came to be known (i.e. monk of the Holy Mountain) who later received the holy schema and the name Sergius, has long since departed to a blessed eternity, but his work for the monastery did not die with him and, in the person of Fr. Jerome, a fitting successor was found to continue his work.  Spiritually enlightened people were also found in Russia, who by their labors, helped Fr. Jerome.  Among them, we might particularly mention His Grace Bishop Theophan who is so well known for his spiritual and ascetic essays.  He graciously assisted in the commendable publishing activities of the monastery, providing a considerable part of his works and his translations, and therefore the community fittingly regards Bishop Theophan as one of the foremost of its benefactors.  Many edifying books, brochures and pamphlets were published by St. Panteleimon's Monastery for the enjoyment of the Orthodox children of Russia. 

Rather than being a desolate monastery falling into complete decay, the community became a model in outward appearance; its buildings and material resources externally, and internally its decorous order, the reverent celebration of the church services, the zeal with which they remembered their benefactors in prayer, and in general the well-ordered passing of the communal life therein were apparent to all and the wonder of everyone who lived on the Holy Mountain.  It was preeminently Fr. Jerome who promoted all this, for in the course of his forty-five years as the spiritual father of this holy Community he kept a constant watch over its material and spiritual interests. 

After the repose of the Elder Arsenius, the senior spiritual father of the Russians on Athos who fell asleep on 24 March 1846, [another source records 25 March 1846 http://remnantrocor.blogspot.com/2016/07/true-elder-arseny-of-mt-athos-1846.html] Fr. Jerome became his successor because of the spiritual authority that he exercised among the Russians on Mt. Athos, and not only among the Russians but among the Greeks, Bulgars, Serbs and the other peoples living there.  Everyone saw in Fr. Jerome a clear manifestation of God's special grace and therefore the zealots of piety and asceticism hastened to him, knowing that through him they would truly learn God's will and would discover the right path to salvation.  His word, as a spiritual father, was always effectual and spiritually profitable for many people. 

Fr. Jerome did not enjoy good health, in fact he was almost always of poor health, and during his last years, it was even completely impossible for him to leave his cell.  He suffered from an abdominal hernia which hindered his movements and caused him torturous pain.  It prevented him from celebrating the divine services and hourly threatened him with the menace of a sudden end, but regardless of this, he bore his sufferings with exceptional patience and gave himself almost no rest.  Furthermore, in the days of the abbacy of Fr. Gerasimos, who because of an infirmity that afflicted his feet spent his last years in bed, the difficult duty of serving the ailing elder fell to Fr. Jerome, as he was the instrument of this populous monastery's administration.  So that they should not unduly disturb the abbot'€™s peace and rest, everyone who required his blessing or agreement informed Fr. Jerome and explained their needs to him, and in this manner the community, which comprised so many different races, was not thrown into anarchy on account of Fr. Gerasimos's infirmity. The benefit given was entirely due to Fr. Jerome. 

Fr. Jerome was the first in the Saint Panteleimon community to make provision for the charitable distribution of alms, and thus he aided the poor monks and desert-dwellers of the Holy Mountain.  In addition to this, a new cenobitic community was founded in Russia itself; this monastery was built in the Caucasus Mountains at Pitsunda, the ancient site of the struggles and martyric witness of the Holy Apostle St. Simon the Canaanite.  The land was granted to the Panteleimon Monastery under the trusteeship of Frs. Jerome and Macarius by the Russian Govemment, and the new community, which followed the order and rule of the Rossikon, was named the New Athonite Monastery of St. Simon the Canaanite.  It would be impossible not to recount among the other attractive Characteristics of the Monastery of St. Panteleimon and of its ruling elders, Frs. Jerome and Macarius, the excellent hospitality which they extended not only to their own immediate visitors on Mt. Athos regardless of their social standing or calling, but even to visitors to the monastery's holdings in Odessa and in Constantinople, and in general to all Russians making their way on pilgrimage either to Athos or to Palestine.  From his solitary Athonite refuge, Fr. Jerome tirelessly kept watch over all the charitable institutions of his community, and he was gladdened in spirit by their work.  The very publication of the pamphlet "Spiritually Profitable Reflections" was the fruit of his initiative. He was a father to his disciples in the fullest sense of that word. It was marvellous to behold the grey-haired elder, suffering from such a merciless sickness, hardly able to move his legs, but surrounded day and night by those who thirsted to receive spiritual treatment at his hands, who poured out their souls before him and whose consciences were thus calmed by him. 

He spent almost half a century as the spiritual father of the Rossikon, and so he manifestly began to approach the end of his days.  From the autumn of 1885, he began to lose more strength.  On 1 October, the Feast of the Protection of the Most Holy Theotokos, which was the dedication festival of the Russian Catholicon, with great difficulty he came to church for the divine liturgy, and having stood throughout the entire service, he partook of the Holy Mysteries in the altar.  This was the last time that he visited the church that he had raised and adorned so magnificently.  In the last months of his life he often said to his intimate disciples that he had not long to live, and he forbade them to pray that his life be prolonged.  Through the bounties of the Russian sovereign, the elder was honored by a golden pectoral cross studded with precious stones; he did not wear it but reverently kept it as a sign of the monarchs kindness towards him.  Now he commanded that this cross be given to the community's sacristy, wherein it was reverently set aside, having parted with him forever.  It was noticeable to his cell-attendants that he had put everything in his cell in order, as if he were preparing for a long journey, putting everything in its place, and that he himself was recollected and reflective.  On 11 November, he felt extremely ill in his stomach; the sickness had been greatly aggravated, and none of his usual medicaments were now of any use.  He could not lie down, but he sat up all the time and took no food.  On 13 November, during the night in the course of the all-night vigil for St. John Chrysostom, the mystery of Holy Unction was performed for him by Archimandrite Macarius with the assembly of the monastery's hieromonks.  The elder prayed fervently during the celebration of this mystery, and then in turn asked forgiveness of Fr. Macarius and the other priestmonks.  At the end of matins on 14 November, a Thursday, they brought to him in his cell the relics of the Greatmartyr and Healer Panteleimon and the wonder-working icon of the Theotokos of Jerusalem, which he kissed reverently.  After the liturgy, at nine o'clock in the morning, the elder quietly departed to the Lord without any death pangs, and thus he reposed in peace. 

The elder's funeral was on Saturday 16 November.  On the eve, the all-night vigil for the departed was celebrated in the monastery's Protection Church where the body of the elder was lying.  On the day of the burial, the holy liturgy was celebrated in the Cathedral of the Holy Great Martyr Panteleimon by His Grace Metropolitan Nilos with a large assembly of priests, and also in the Protection Catholicon where Archimandrite Macarius was also concelebrating with many other priests.  When, during the sermon, the brotherhood began to bid farewell to their revered spiritual father and elder, the preachers words evoked tears and sobs, which witnessed to the esteem in which many held him.  After the brethren had bidden the body of the elder farewell, those people from the world who were in the monastery as pilgrims came forward, and in their midst was one suffering from demonic possession.  He began to shout and resist, so much so that he was forcibly brought up and made to touch the departed man's hand, after which he calmed down and began to pray fervently.  At the end of the liturgy in the Protection Church, a litia was celebrated as the body was borne to the lower Church of St. Panteleimon; during this the possessed one again began to cry out in frenzy, calling to mind a certain Anastasia and reproaching her for bringing him and saying that she was afflicting him.  Scarcely had he been brought close to the body again and made to touch the hand than he became peaceable once more, began to pray and cross himself and, as they took the elder's body into the lower church, he accompanied it clinging to the end of the shroud on which the priest-monks bore it.  In the church of St. Panteleimon, His Eminence Metropolitan Nilos met the procession together with his concelebrants, and he began the funeral service.  When the last kissing of the reposed began, the weeping and sobbing increased so much that it drowned the sound of the chanting.  At this point, another possessed pilgrim screamed and began to be convulsed in a spasm, but on touching the hand of the reposed elder he became peaceable.  Up to eighty hieromonks and twenty hierodeacons took part in the funeral which, together with the liturgy, lasted about seven hours.  The elder's body was laid within the monastery, under the altar of the community's main church, that of the Martyr Panteleimon.  It was laid in the very tomb where, sometime earlier, the remains of Archimandrite Gerasimos had been buried, and in this manner these two who had not been separated during their days on earth were united in death.  They were the wardens, the renovators and the benefactors of the community of St. Panteleimon, for they had labored greatly for its prosperity and spiritual renewal.

Translated from the Russian by Holy Transfiguration Monastery from Biographies of Russian Strugglers for Piety of the 18th (7 19th Centuries, November volume, pp. 305-325 (Moscow: 1910)-